A few musical addictions

I haven’t done a music post in a while so I thought I’d recommend a few of my favourites for this fine #musicmonday.

Drake – Thank Me Later

Now while I’ve been listening to the album a lot lately, I’m not the biggest fan of Drake. He has catchy songs, which I really enjoy from time to time, but like he says in one of them, his career is so over produced and created. I can’t see this upper class kid rapping about what he raps about and take him seriously. He lacks what the kids call “street cred”.

Eminem – Recovery

When I was a teenager I used to be such a big fan of Eminem. As the years went by and the albums got ridiculously repetitive (funny, serious, kim/hayley, repeat) I lost interest in him. I haven’t even bothered picking up his previous two albums and according to him on this one, that’s a good thing because they sucked. I’m not sure if this is a case of someone who has gone stale and is trying to revamp his career, but Eminem seems to share a lot more and not just take jabs at his family and celebs (though these themes pop up once or twice).

Broken Bells – self titled

Thanks to Twitter I was introduced to Broken Bells. I’d never heard of them before, but now I love this album. It’s a mellow album, for the most part, and EVERY song is single-worthy, which is so hard to find with music today. I highly recommend this one if you’re looking for new music to listen to.

My review of “The girl who played with fire”

The 2nd book in Stieg Larsson’s trilogy, “The girl who played with fire” comes in at spot 12 for my “26 in 52 Challenge“. Every time I write one of these posts, I go ‘oh I’m so behind’ etc, and this one will continue that trend. It’s been taking longer to read books of late; though in my defense these two come in at over 700 each, and I’m a notoriously slow reader. Anyway, moving on…

As Lisbeth Salander’s life begins to move to better things, she gets accused of three homicides and there’s damning evidence which makes her the prime suspect. Two of the three murders are colleagues of Mikael Blomqvist, conveniently enough. He doesn’t believe Salander is guilty and tries everything he can to prove her innocence. Unfortunately for him, she hates him and doesn’t do much in the way of help, until later on. So the story continues on as we follow Blomqvist and Salander as they try to uncover the mystery of who shot those three people. They don’t appear together until the end of the book, but they follow parallel paths to figure things out.

I found this one a bit slower than the first, but still quite enjoyable. What I enjoyed most, was learning the background of Salander. Finding out what made her who she is only made her character seem that much more interesting. She seems like the underdog who can’t catch a break in life, so though she’s crass, you want to cheer for her, every step of the way.

The story line seemed a bit over-planned to me. Where the first book felt like the series of events that happened were natural, this seemed like every character that was introduced was just a convenient plant for a plot twist. I know that may sound weird to say because all books are planned, but that’s just how it feels for me.

While I have a few issues with the book, I give this one a 4 out of 5.

Have you read it yet? Thoughts? Here’s the trailer:

Hey Jon Hamm, can you play Batman?

For a while now my nephew and I have agreed that Jon Hamm, of Mad Men fame, should be Batman. The conversation recently started up again after watching the trailer for his newest movie, The Town (trailer). I thought we were pretty original, but a simple Google search shows that isn’t really the case (bonus means I don’t have to edit a photo (thanks for posting it on ComicBookMovie.com, MovieTheaterLad!)

I was not happy with the way Christian Bale plays The Dark Knight. His growling was the biggest annoyance in the movie and if I recall, caused me to give it only 4.5 stars out of 5.

Even Kevin Smith agrees, though he takes it a little far saying he should also play Superman, which is dumb.

Last year, in a video interview with Splash Page, an MTV blog, Smith said, “He’s always brooding on that show. He comes off like Bruce Wayne. That voice of his—the Don Draper voice—that’s f—ing Batman!”

Perfectly describes my reaction.

While we’re still on the Batman topic, what about Vincent Kartheiser (Pete Campbell, Mad Men) as Robin? I say IT’S PERFECT!

The Social Network is not for me

It’s only fitting that the site that was created to waste everyone’s valuable time has been made into a movie, that looks like it will waste everyone’s valuable time. Many people on my twitter stream (of all places) have been shouting out how much they’d love to watch The Social Network (the Facebook movie), and I just can’t understand why.

Ever since it was first talked about last year, I thought it was a joke, then a dumb idea. It seemed like something College Humor would jump on, not a movie studio. The newest trailer (below), released last week, even looks kind of College Humor-ish. It’s over-dramatic and I’m pretty sure has a few exaggerations. I couldn’t see the creation of a website being as exciting as it was. I’m sure Mark Zuckerberg became quite popular, and thanks to all the blog posts and interviews out there, we all know the issues he faced getting it off the ground, but is it worth about 2hrs of my time?

This movie also answers the question “Is Hollywood out of ideas?” with a resounding YES. What ever happened to waiting a few years to reflect back on the relevance of a cultural phenomenon? I’d much rather watch this if it was made a few years down the road.

All this being said, I’ll still go see the movie when it comes out on October 1, 2010. I won’t go into it with the most open of minds, but if I end up liking it I’ll fully admit it, and then blog my love.

What’s your opinion on the movie? Agree/Disagree with me, and WHY?

Here’s the trailer if you haven’t seen it yet:

Conflicted over the G20 conflicts

This weekend’s G20 in Toronto saw some of the most astonishing acts I’ve ever seen in my city. My feelings on what happened are quite conflicted and I’m sure many Torontonians are feeling the same.

I’m all for people peacefully protesting for causes they believe in; this is a right we all have, living in a democratic country. At the beginning, many of the protesters were in fact being peaceful from what I could see on TV. If this continued, I’m sure the police wouldn’t have acted as much as they eventually did. It was only when the infamous Black Bloc decided to join in, that everything decided to hit the fan.

It’s now common knowledge that these thugs aren’t there to protest for any cause, but to cause damage and incite rioting. After all of this happened, the police were taking no chances with protesters, blocking them off at all points and trying to disperse them wherever they could. At this point, I fully supported the actions taken by the police and G20 security forces, however it would’ve been much more advantageous to all if they’d stopped them before causing the damage . It’s very easy to judge forces on their actions, but I’m sure it’s much more difficult for them to plan on where/when they’ll specifically attack.

They did step up their take down of others, after the fact, who had changed out of their black garb and into regular civilian clothing. With all the surveillance downtown, many were probably caught and in other seemingly non-violent protests, the police took out individuals they deemed suspicious.

Many say they were attacking innocent people but if they have intelligence that rioters are texting to mobilize troops then it makes sense to take out people texting. I wasn’t there and I’m sure there are those who will disagree with me, but if police are also telling people to repeatedly to back away and they don’t? Well that that also gives them reasonable cause to take action, in my opinion.

On Sunday night there were many people who were held up at Spadina Avenue & Queen Street West for about four hours. Quite a few, even members of the media, were detained or arrested. The thing is, most of these people weren’t protesting anything, but say they were just in the area. The question that I asked all weekend was, if you’re not protesting anything, why are you putting yourself in such close vicinity of the officers who you know are arresting people who get too close? Many people would’ve solved much strife by listening, or just staying home. That being said, many of these people were held in the pouring rain for much of the time and not provided with any kind of shelter – that’s not acceptable. What’s even less acceptable was the fact that after holding people for so long, they eventually let many go since they had no space for them in the chartered TTC buses. It just goes to show they had no legitimate reason to hold them to begin with.

It’s been said many times, but these meetings, where nothing new is apparently done, should be taking place at the UN or on secure military bases, if they insist on having it in a different country each time. The over $1 billion cost to tax payers is ridiculous coming from a summit that is supposed to discuss creating a more fiscally sound world economy. That money, as we all know, could go to countless different causes and make many peoples’ lives better. And what about the cost of repairs to many businesses who have had their facades destroyed and others who have had to close for security reasons? I didn’t have feelings either way toward this summit until it came to my city, but now I wish it never did.

Please check out the Toronto Star’s photo blog on the G20 protests.

My review of “The girl with the dragon tattoo”

The late Stieg Larsson‘s book “The girl with the dragon tattoo” takes spot number 11 in my “26 in 52 challenge“. Being week number 24 I’m still a book behind. I’ll have to either read a short one or buckle down and finish two books in two weeks at some point. I’m still looking forward to the challenge!

After reading this, one thing was decided; I now have two others penned in for future reading. In fact, the 2nd one, “The girl who played with fire” is sitting beside me with the bookmark freshly placed inside.

When I bought this book, I didn’t pay much attention to the storyline, I’ll admit. I was mostly buying it based on hype, and the fact that I used a birthday gift card and had nothing to lose. My presumption of the book was that it would focus completely on the loner with a dark past, Lisbeth Salander, but it was equally (or more so) about her and tarnished journalist, Mikael Blumqvist.

Both of their stories come together as the two of them try to solve a murder mystery, which during the early stages gave the story a “Clue” feeling, but investigating a murder from 60 years prior. Of course, the book wouldn’t have garnered such enthusiasm if it had been a simple murder mystery, but I won’t ruin it for you, if you haven’t read it.

A major thread throughout the book that I found interesting is the relationship experiences of Blomqvist and Salander. First, Blomqvist, divorced with a teenage child, is in his 40s, has a “friends with benefits” relationship with his longtime pal and business partner; he also has been known to seek out women on a regular basis. Salander on the other hand had a much more disturbing experience.

Much of her past has yet to be revealed, but Salander has had multiple partners, both male and female, and is goes about life disconnected from her emotions, especially when it comes to love. In the book she also goes through a terrible rape by her legal guardian who blackmails her into doing his bidding (against her will is an understatement here). This only builds her mistrust for men and further causes her to bury her emotions.

As the two stories collide, both Blomqvist and Salander being spending much more time together and though they would seem the most unlikely pairing, there’s a bond between the two that can’t be stopped. I enjoyed the extremes of the two characters and how they came to meet somewhat in the middle as the book went on.

I enjoyed the book quite a lot, but I wouldn’t say it’s deep enough in character development just yet to say this one will be on my top 5 or 10. I’ll hold back judgment until I’ve read them and can be a better judge. I’ll give this one a 4/5.

For the next book, I’m not sure how they’ll bring the two back together again, but I am sure if the writing in this one is any indicator, it’s sure to be an entertaining read.

Movie-wise I have yet to watch the Swedish version, but now that I’m finished the book I’m curious to see how they portrayed the characters. Watching the trailer I found it looks well done, and while interested I’m kind of not interested in the Americans taking it over and making it their own.

Have you read the book or watched the movie? What did you think?

No pressure South Africa only the world is watching

Today marked day one of FIFA World Cup 2010. Host country South Africa played to a 1-1 draw against the powerhouse Mexico (not) to kick things off on an exciting note.

I occasionally watch the Toronto FC here and there, and every four years when the World Cup rolls around I become a temporary fan. Soccer is a bit too slow for my liking; kind of like football (North American kind). I tend to drift in and out consciousness for both, but when it’s on the world stage, there’s a whole other kind of magic.

My immediate family background is British (Mom) and Caribbean (Dad). Since my Dad’s country (St. Vincent & the Grenadines) fairs worse than Canada, I tend to stick with England as my team of choice. England is kind of like the Maple Leafs because they’re generally on the cusp of greatness, but it’s been an eternity since they’ve won.

As the tournament ramps up I generally get more and more into the sport, especially since I have an allegiance to one team. I’m excited for England’s first match tomorrow against the United States. I’m not sure if I’ll head out or not, but either way I’ll be wearing my Rooney jersey and cheering them on. I think they’ll win, but if they don’t it will mean a lot of trouble, and I wouldn’t want to be anywhere near a pub in England if they lost.

Since I normally do this I figured I’d give my predictions on the winners from each group. Much of it is based on little to no knowledge, which means I should do well. The two teams from each group that I pick to advance are bolded.

Group A – South Africa, Mexico, Uruguay, France

Group B – Argentina, Nigeria, Korea Rep., Greece

Group C – England, USA, Algeria, Slovenia

Group D – Germany, Australia, Serbia, Ghana

Group E – Netherlands, Denmark, Japan, Cameroon

Group F – Italy, Paraguay, New Zealand, Slovakia

Group G – Brazil, Korea DPR, Ivory Coast, Portugal

Group H – Spain, Switzerland, Honduras, Chile

(And they say there are too many teams in NHL playoffs.. geez.)

iPhone 4 is here!

Since Gizmodo posted the original shots of that “lost” iPhone 4 prototype I’ve been waiting extremely patiently for Steve Jobs to do his thing at the official launch. Today was that day.

As some of you may know I’m one of those unfortunate folks who, while a fan of technology and one who takes part on many different platforms, has gone without mobile access to those platforms. I do have an iPod Touch, which when there’s WiFi is awesome, but there are so many more times when WiFi isn’t around, and I’m jonesin’ to be connected.

So since I’ve held out for so long, I figured it’d be worth it to invest in the upcoming iPhone 4. With today’s launch there are a few things that tell me this is going to be a great investment, including (in no particular order):

  • Multitasking – finally the ability to do more than one task on the device!
  • Flash – should’ve had this from the start, and is one of the biggest complaints I hear from iPhone users
  • Front-facing Camera (though a camera period is great since I’m a Touch user.)
  • 960 x 640 @ 326 ppi - great resolution and something I wasn’t expecting
  • Sleek design – it’s exactly the kind of style I like; very modern.

More specs can be found on Apple’s website.

Rogers says it’ll be carrying the device, and you can sign up to receive word on any upcoming info regarding the release. We do know it’ll be released in Canada sometime in July, and in the States pre-ordering starts on the 15th. I can’t wait.

Will you be upgrading to the next version of the iPhone? What features stand out for you the most?

My review of Generation A

Douglas Coupland’s (most?) recent novel, Generation A, is book number 10 in my 26 in 52 Challenge. It caught my eye while trying to use up a gift certificate I got for my birthday last month. This one was billed as the new Generation X, and meant to take a look at storytelling in the digital world. I’d read a couple of his books already (and reviewed one or two on here) so I thought I’d give it a go.

The premise of the book is about five young people who lived in separate parts of the world, and were all stung by bees within about a few days of eachother. The quirky part is that bees are extinct (which is a bit of social commentary on where we’re headed anyway, but this time with a twist, which I won’t reveal). After they’re stung, government-types come and take them away and they become media sensations. They’re each put in secluded rooms and are studied to find the properties that attracted the supposedly dying/dead species to sting them in the first place.

Eventually the five connect with one another and after a sequence of events end up sharing fictional stories together. Each person told about two stories, which were probably the most interesting part of the book. For example, the one of Bartholomew who had been around since cave man times and had developed the English language. He helped take it from ughs to proper grammar, but eventually language started to degrade into txk sp33k, which caused Bartholomew to become disengage himself from the bastardized language. One day, after he noticed it was too silent, Bartholomew discovered that the rapture had come and taken everyone away, except for those who hadn’t accepted the new way of speaking.

This was a weird book for me to wrap my head around. Compared to the other stuff I read by Coupland, this one seemed a bit science fiction-like, which threw me off. To me there was little flow between the fictional tales told by the five sting victims and the reasons for the plot as a whole was a little outlandish. The book did however take a look at storytelling, as mentioned, which is something we don’t do very much of (verbally anyway). We’re often stuck on our mobile devices or writing our lame blogs, but creativity sometimes falls by the wayside in favour of immediacy of a message. It’s a good reminder to sit back and let those creative juices flow; it’s always there, you just have to pay attention.

My final verdict for Generation A, is a 2.5/5

Jessica at RoundLetters shares a different opinion of the book and it’s a good read for comparison if you get the chance.

If you’ve read the book, tell me what you thought about it!

My musical addiction: B.O.B

Artist: Bobby Simmons

Album: The Adventures of Bobby Ray

Release Date: April 27, 2010

Up until about two weeks ago I had no clue who this guy was, until after I saw he sampled a Vampire Weekend song. I decided to check out the track and liked it.

The album has a few great tracks on it and features the likes of Hayley Williams (Paramore), Lupe Fiasco, T.I., Eminem, etc. So for an artist I’d never heard of he had some good backing and production on this album. It likely won’t be an album I’ll want to listen to a year or two down the road, but for now it’s catchy and has quite a few single-worthy tracks on it. One of them is Airplanes, part II featuring Hayley Williams & Eminem. The Eminem part really made the song for me, which was and still is a bit of a shock, since I’d grown quite sick of him over the years.

This is a fun summer album that if you’re into the top 40 kind of music, you’ll probably enjoy. If you’re more “indy” then this isn’t one for you. Here’s the first single off of the album called Nothin’ on you. It’s a great, catchy track as well. Enjoy!